Complexity Explorer Santa Few Institute

Introduction to Open Science

Lead instructor:

Your progress is not being saved! Enroll now or log in to track your progress or submit homework.

6.4 Unit 6 References » Unit 6.2 - Peer Review

Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6.

Ford, E. (2015). Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observationaloverview. F1000Research, 4.

Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., ... & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). The Peer Reviewers Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), 150547.

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological science, 22(11), 1359-1366.

Parker, T. H., Griffith, S. C., Bronstein, J. L., Fidler, F., Foster, S., Fraser, H., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency. Nature ecology & evolution, 2(6), 929-935.

Aleksic, J., Alexa, A., Attwood, T. K., Hong, N. C., Dahlö, M., Davey, R., & Vieira, B. M. (2014). The open science peer review oath. F1000Research, 3.